Dilemma
I’m clueless at defending my design choices, what do I do?
Quick tip
There is making design choices and being able to defend them, this guide is to how to equip you in achieving the latter. As we all know in architecture regardless of whether it is during studies or during work, we will always have to defend all design choices we make. We have provided our take on how one may possibly be able to achieve this.
First Things First
In life, most worthwhile actions we output require a process, such as walking, talking or even riding a bicycle. These processes have either derived as a skill adapted through growth or by much practice and weaving it into our day to day lives.
A prime example could be, going out of the day. Subject to how you do it and how long it may take an individual the basis is globally similar;
We plan to go somewhere - this may be consciously or subconsciously
We prepare - either by getting ready or arranging the requirements of the visit
We get ready - this involves its own process in itself
We travel to the place - this again involves its own process
Essentially as provided above, something as simple as going somewhere whether it may be the shops, to university or to work— involves a process. All processes can be made into a habit after a while.
Statistics indicate;
On average it takes 18 to 254 days to form a new habit
It takes 66 days for a new behavior to become automatic
Step by step guide
Step 1
What is your point?
I put the window in to the left of the wall by the lamp.
*crickets*
That is great to know but we want to know why this will assist us in understanding the rest of your justification. All you’ve done is make a point.
Critical Design success rate: 25%
Step 2
What’s the basis?
Science [insert reference] states that windows are more meaningful within structures if it’s purpose frames key views whilst providing sufficient light and ventilation.
That’s a bit better, as you’ve given us some background and some research to your decision making. Even though it’s stronger, it is still lacking the full defence factor.
Critical Design success: 50%
Step 3
How does this background research inform this design?
The structure sits within a tree prominent site and there is a characterful tree specie that this window seeks to capture within its frame, relating to the type of wood used on the floor and balustrade finishing within the space the window sits within.
A common mistake made is, the research being irrelevant to the actual design at hand. It is recommended that you explain why this research has informed a design decision made.
Critical Design success Rate: 75%
Step 4
End on a high note
In summary, placing the window in this location will emphasise the presence of the rare tree specie for the users entering this space, enabling the designed space to relate seamlessly to its surrounding context.
Finally, the point has been summarised and a firm defence for your design decision has been provided.
Critical Design success Rate: 100%
To conclude
During a crit, an exam or even a professional based discussion it is essential you are able to back up any design decisions you make. Firstly state your point and ensure it is obvious. Secondly, back it up with facts and more than once if possible, the more the merrier. Thirdly, ensure these facts relate to this design choice in particular and strengthen it, rather than weaken it. Finally, conclude your statement by discussing how this design decision is effective and purposeful.
Not only will this advice, enable you to defend design decisions but it will also encourage you to make purposeful design choices in the future.
Comments